Project
goals and objectives |
Develop a state-of-the-art computational
model and perform nonlinear dynamic analysis of the UC-Berkeley Life
Sciences building using the OpenSees simulation platform to demonstrate
PEER performance-based earthquake engineering assessment and design methodologies.
The project has dual objectives:
- Testbed for simulation in OpenSees using actual buildings, and
- Developing floor displacement and acceleration time histories to
be utilized in testing building contents
|
|
Figure 1: Structural plan view of LSA building
Larger View
|
|
Role
of this project in supporting PEER’s vision |
The project is a realistic demonstration for the computational platform
of PEER, namely OpenSees. Moreover, through the simulations, assessment
of the importance of a number of uncertain variables will be conducted.
This includes not only ground shaking details but also mass, damping, modeling
assumptions (e.g. 2-D versus 3-D) and component force-deformation behavior
of the selected building. |
|
Figure 2: OpenSees 2-D model of LSA building
Larger View
|
|
Methodology
employed |
-
Collect information about the structural system of the testbed, including
member sizes, foundation type, material properties, and configuration
and layout of any non-structural components.
-
Survey available modeling
options in OpenSees for representing structural elements including
current nonlinear elements for geometric and material
effects. This survey considered modeling issues related to soil conditions
and interfaces
between structural and non-structural elements.
-
Develop a 2-D model where
emphasis is on the structural system and boundary conditions using
the available options in OpenSees.
-
Conduct time history analysis of the
several available ground motions developed for the building site to
address uncertainty in the ground
motion details.
-
Generate floor time histories of relative and absolute
displacements and accelerations for use by the researchers (at UCB
and UCI) conducting
the shake table experiments
on the LSA building contents.
-
Extend the structural model to 3-D
to account for multi-directional ground motion effects and have more
realistic distribution of mass
and lateral stiffness.
-
Simulate the 3-D model of the building
with different properties addressing variability in mass, damping,
and force-deformation
relations of the
different structural components comprising the 3-D model.
-
Explore
the application of the finite element response sensitivity analysis
for LSA using OpenSees-Reliability developed by T.
Haukaas & A. Der
Kiureghian.
|
|
Figure 3: Description of ENT material to simulate soil behavior in OpenSees
Larger View
Figure 4: Spring forces in soil springs due to 50% in
50 years Coyote Lake earthquake
Larger View
Figure 5: Relative displacements of Roof due to 50%
in 50 years, Coyote earthquake
Larger View
|
|
Brief
description of past year’s accomplishments and more detail on
expected Year 6 accomplishments |
-
2-D working nonlinear model in OpenSees of the coupled shear wall
lateral load-resisting system in the transverse direction (normal to
the Hayward fault) as shown in Figures 1 and 2 (Year 5).
-
Account for modeling
foundation and soil conditions of the 2-D model, refer to Figures 3
and 4 (Year 5).
-
Develop floor accelerations and deformation
to be used for the shake table tests of the building equipments using
several ground
motions developed by other researchers for the building site, sample
results (one simulation out of thirty) are given in Figures 5, 6, and
7 (years
5 and 6).
-
Perform deterministic sensitivity study (Year 6) where probabilistic
hazard curve is used to determine the intensity measures in terms of
spectral accelerations.
This is followed by determining representative ground motion profiles.
Finally, several sources of uncertainties were accounted for using their
swings in the
form of Tornado diagrams as shown in Figure 8.
-
Simulate the 3-D model
of the building with different properties addressing variability in mass,
damping, and force-deformation relations of the
different structural components comprising the 3-D model, Figure 9 (Year
6).
|
|
Figure 6: Relative accelerations of Roof due to 50% in 50 years, Coyote
earthquake
Larger View
Figure 7: Absolute displacement of Roof due to 50% in 50 years, Coyote
earthquake
Larger View
|
|
Figure 8: Tornado diagrams for different engineering demand parameters
to demonstrate the importance of different sources of uncertainties
Larger View
|
Other
similar work being conducted within and outside PEER and how this project
differs |
Other testbeds includes the study of the Van Nuys building and the I880
bridges. This project is unique in the fact it represents shear wall building
designed according to relatively modern codes and standards. Moreover,
3-D models and deterministic sensitivity analysis are pursued in the current
project focusing on performance of building content and non-structural
elements, in addition to the structural ones. |
Plans
for Year 7 if this project is expected to be continued |
Further
account of uncertainties in ground motion and modeling and developing
means of reducing them should be pursued. One major issue is
the development of EDP’s for the performance of building
content. This should be pursued in light of the tests conducted
at UC-Berkeley
and UC-Irvine. With this set of test results, possible development
of representative limit states of the performance of the building
content can be formulated and utilized with the developed computational
model of the building to investigate losses due to damage to
the building content. One specific issue is to develop tornado
diagrams
in terms of design variables (related to building content and
non-structural components). |
|
Figure 9: 3-D model of the Life Science Addition
Larger View
|
|
Describe
any instances where you are aware that your results have been used
in industry |
Our
generated floor responses have been extensively used in the tests of
the building content at UC-Berkeley and UC-Irvine. This effort is utilized
by Berkeley campus in collaboration with Rutherford and Chekene to
develop retrofitting schemes of the building and particularly means
of attaching its sensitive and valuable contents. |
Expected
milestones |
The project main milestones are:
- May 2002: Complete the 2-D
model of the building and its associated simulations
- Sept 2002: Identify
the important uncertain variables based on the 2-D working model
- March
2002: Finalize the deterministic sensitivity analysis using the 2-D
model
- April 2003: Complete the simulations using the 3-D model and
investigate the important uncertainties
- June 2003: Address the modeling
issues related to any non-structural components, such as partitions
or building contents
- Sept 2003: Summarize results and produce the
final report
|
Deliverables |
The project main deliverables include:
- A working 2-D model
of the building
- A working 3-D model of the building
- A complete suite of time histories
of displacements and accelerations for the building floors under
the effect of the developed ground
motions for the
site.
Results of the deterministic sensitivity analyses from the 2-D
and 3-D models with ordering of importance of the different sources
of
the uncertainties
affecting the structural performance of the building and its contents |