2002 Annual Meeting Program

PROGRAM
To download the program/registration form in PDF format (223KB), click here.

Day 1—Thursday January 17, 2002
Methodology Testbeds Meetings

Closed meeting for PEER participants only
(Participants are: funded researchers, students, committee members,
individuals from Business and Industry Partner organizations, and other supported project personnel.)

8:00 am	Poster Session room available for students/BIP members to assemble posters
8:30	*Registration table/Continental breakfast opens*
10:00	Testbed Meeting plenary session
11:00	Testbed Meeting break-out sessions
3:00 pm	Testbed Meeting adjourns
3:00	*PEER Student Day--*open only to students, BIP members/practitioners, and post-doctoral researchers. Closed to PI’s/faculty.
3:00	*Closed sessions for principal investigators/faculty*
6:00	*Invitational Reception and Banquet for PEER Business and Industry Partners (BIP)* Featured speaker: Mr. Ronald O. Hamburger, Chief Structural Engineer, ABS Consulting “The World Trade Center and its Relevance to Performance-Based Engineering”

Day 2—Friday January 18, 2002
"Progress in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology"
Open to the public

7:30 am	*Registration table/continental breakfast opens; Poster room opens for set-up*
9:00	Session #1–Progress in PBEE Methodology
	Jack Moehle, UC Berkeley Introduction Gregory Deierlein, Stanford University Overview of the PBEE Methodology Helmut Krawinkler, Stanford University Seismic Demand Analysis Eduardo Miranda, Stanford University Relating Structural Response to Damage and Losses Gregory Fenves, UC Berkeley Structural Seismic Simulation–Advances in OpenSees Ahmed Elgamal, UC San Diego Geotechnical Seismic Simulation Peter May, University of Washington Thinking Ahead: Issues for Adoption of PBEE Stephanie Chang, University of Washington Lessons from Nisqually Earthquake for PBEE
11:15	*Poster Session and Lunch Break*
1:30 pm	*Session #2 (concurrent structural and geotechnical sessions)*
	Structural Emphasis Allin Cornell, Stanford University Practical Application of the PEER Methodology Jack Moehle, UC Berkeley Shear, Axial Load, Drift Criteria for Shear-Critical Building Columns John Stanton, University of Washington Limit States for RC Beam-Column Connections Ian Robertson, University of Hawaii Limit States for Slab-Column Connections Marc Eberhard, University of Washington Limit States and Design Parameters for Flexurally Dominated Bridge Columns Steve Mahin, UC Berkeley Seismic Performance Modeling for RC Bridges	Geotechnical Emphasis Doug Dreger, UC Berkeley Ground Motions: Basin Modeling and Rapid Response Jonathan Stewart, UCLA Site Categorization and Amplification Factors Ray Seed, UC Berkeley Predictive Models for Liquefaction Hazard Nick Sitar and Elizabeth Hausler, UC Berkeley Performance of Improved Ground Geoffrey Martin, USC Performance of Shallow Foundations Craig Comartin, Comartin-Reis and Gyimah Kasali, Rutherford and Chekene Implications of UC Berkeley/PEER Pier Load Tests
4:30	Annual Meeting Adjourns